Does anyone know whether the results of the NZ conference have been (or still can be) differentiated according to number, type or any other features of nasal swabs (PCR or other)?
Since inclusion of nanotech in nasal swabs had been patented in/by Johns Hopkins already prior to the plandemic (e.g. by means of so-called 'theragrippers'), I can imagine that some 'outbreaks' resulted from (intentional) contamination and preparation of nasal swabs.
That's probably one reason why some WHO 'key persons' are so sure that another plandemic is pending .. and that they try to get more money for their business model.
@ matt & NZ conf participants:
Does anyone know whether the results of the NZ conference have been (or still can be) differentiated according to number, type or any other features of nasal swabs (PCR or other)?
Since inclusion of nanotech in nasal swabs had been patented in/by Johns Hopkins already prior to the plandemic (e.g. by means of so-called 'theragrippers'), I can imagine that some 'outbreaks' resulted from (intentional) contamination and preparation of nasal swabs.
That's probably one reason why some WHO 'key persons' are so sure that another plandemic is pending .. and that they try to get more money for their business model.
Scientific Study- Corona Is Technology And Frequency Induced! Effect of Coronavirus Worldwide through Misusing of Wireless Sensor Networks
https://open.substack.com/pub/anamihalceamdphd/p/scientific-study-corona-is-technology?r=1qpmbr&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web