Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Pirate Studebaker's avatar

This movie and The Charles E. Holman Foundation are psyops. It's been known for many years. You have to know Morgellons well and pay attention to the twists and turns of the movie, but it's, frankly, crap.

That's why no Carnicom or Staninger. Legit honest people have nothing to do with ones like these who made this movie.

IMO. CIA and DOD and DARPA data gathering enterprise. Corral the guinea pigs and milk them for data to better construct the modern version known as the CV19 vaccine, etc.. as well as PR to "control the narrative" of Morgellons. which they've been doing the entire time.

Carnicom and others have proven Morgellons and the current tech of the "vaccines" are the same in most ways. The CV19 "vaccine" is a modification of Morgellons. Long game planning.

The movie was released six years ago and made years before in pieces as they raised money. I lived in Austin where the Charles E. Holman Foundation was headquartered and already had Morgellons and looked into them up close and deeply. No go. Stay away.

Most of the "real" scenes are contrived like the Dr. and the Morgellons lady at the convention. Just hokey and weird.

My inner Rogers and Ebert give two thumbs down. If this movie can be of any use to a viewer it will be as a study of how a psyop is run, how people make money from them and what the goals are.

Never underestimate disaster capitalism. Be it LA or Lahaina "wildfires" or Tennessee hurricanes or Morgellons or disabling and killing diseases from "vaccines". Lots of moola to be made.

Vultures. Hey, just noticed - LA and Lahaina. La-La Lands. Both.

My two cents.

Expand full comment
Apologetic Yankee's avatar

Carnicom is rarely cited > imo his research is a fantastic barometer weeding out/exposing the bad actors/Psyops we're surrounded by > if a Humanitarian who we know knows exactly who Clifford is neglects to cite CI Research whenever addressing the narrative of Morgs, the Transhumanist Agenda & or Climate Engineering, it goes to demonstrate they're not the Advocate as advertised.

I am aware of countless missed opportunities whereby a name with a respectable following omitted citing Clifford's work.... even those who had straight up promised to support in any way they could going forward on camera during a Podcast with Clifford at the Table > not just 1 but a handful of So-Called Advocates out there peddling their own Agenda...books, docs, etc > truly shameful proving this specific Landscape is seedy AF & has been for 2+ Decades.

Expand full comment
37 more comments...

No posts