Recently I became seriously ill with Sepsis, Flu and Pneumonia. I still have no idea how. It happened over three hours. I’m Unvaxxed but I live with a person who is triple vaxxed. While in hospital I was, I believe, further poisoned with a venom based drug after they enrolled me into a research program without my consent. I have no idea what they poisoned me with but I almost died when my diaphragm froze. I saved my life with Ivermectin. Does anyone know the name of a private lab which would analyse my blood to establish what they injected me with ?
Just another thing about the little guy laser. You can't type if you have to hold it on the belly. I'm trying the groin area, the skin is thin depending on the location,thinner than the belly, so that is good for effect (?). The groin is kept occupied but typing is no problem...as the undies keeps it in place😍
True, feeling well doesn't always mean being well. However, in the context of wellness there is a psychosomatic angle to a certain degree. Our pH test is actually based on science and research and we do use it as a way to quantify laser results as the data is showing there are pretty accurate each time also having blood samples to compare with. The biggest benefit is that we get data points to analyse as without any testing we would just be chasing our tail to a point and people don't always feel an improvement yet the numbers are generally quite affirming. The holes and pitfalls are indeed a trap as if we ignore these, good solutions can be missed.
Photon bio modulation has some amazing areas of healing especially when this part of science has been used to design what we are fighting today. Call it fighting fire with fire or photons with photons. Appreciate the dialogue, we must all pursue this problem with open minds given the nature of the problem and so we don't lock ourselves out of any potential resolutions.
Blood is indeed extremely sensitive to fluctuations in pH and less forgiving. Additionally, we would very likely get differing results with urine and saliva in which I have coded for both in my software and this would expand the results for these compensations which could very well assist with further analysis methodologies.
We are aware that there are multiple pH levels across the body and a voltage test on one variable such as external body voltage doesn't give the complete picture as I am aware of the multiple domains of pH levels through the body from blood, through to the gut requiring varying levels to achieve their goals.
Voltage testing is a marker of pH levels in the body with one context specifically related to cell functioning and performance in relation to Zeta Potential, one topic not given the credit it fully deserves in mainstream medical sciences it seems.. who goes into a doctors office and gets an electrical body voltage test when there is science to prove its high efficacy? - look up the work of Dr Jerry Tennant (25th top doctor in the USA who founded the concept), Thomas Riddick(read this: Control of colloid stability through zeta potential), and expanding to efforts of Gerald Pollack (https://www.pollacklab.org/publications).
Remember, the laser is designed for an already quantified purpose and if it made people sicker we would have already seen the fallout yet, through observational analysis, the results speak for themselves.
The voltage testing is passive, meaning, it presents only the raw data but because it is based on a scientific methodology we have to ask the question 'are we now seeing a new baseline as compared to say 20 years ago if we were to employ the same technique?'. Either way, the laser is empirically sound, the voltage testing is a work in progress and gives us new data points for further research.
However, we are dealing with a new set of variables in terms of a multifaceted problem with extra mechanisms in the blood that should not be there and so any proven metric to gain data points such as body voltage testing enables us to get a better picture about any disparities or discontinuities while providing new data points to chase.
What is unusual is that the work of Dr Jerry Tennant states that our body voltage should operate within a range of -400 - 400mV yet we are seeing min and max values upwards of 5000mV and I even found a result with 6000mV on one occasion.
I have encountered some information about the spike in electrical charge being relevant to lets call them plasmon particulates in the blood causing some interference with the body electronics in terms of positive and negative charges surrounding blood cells. When the research presents these particulates having an "overunity" meaning being able to spend more energy than is absorbed, by a magnitude in order of 10-12 times, then we can hypothesize that the spikes could very well correlated to the voltage min and max values as not everyone has the same results but many show spikes in the positive and negative values.
I'm always recalibrating my methods in conjunction with feedback from experts and research, interestingly enough mainstream research don't appear to be holding all their cards close to their chest as there is some very damning research pointing to the problems today, it's just written in riddles making it very difficult to translate.
Love the dialogue, this is what gives new frames of reference to discovering new avenues to travel and to be closed minded is to shut the gate to a new world of possibilities.
When you say Ph levels were raised by 2 points from 5 to 7 and 7 to 9 are these blood Ph?
Does it concern you that a Ph of 9 is considered an indication of alkalosis which can be very harmful to the body especially the kidneys? And someone who has a Ph of 5 is in acidosis and likely quite ill?
The body's blood Ph is normally 7 to 7.45 and strictly maintained by checks and balances within the body system for good reason.
Wondering, not criticising...Thank you for the report.
What is in the blood today is messing with 'the body systems' and this has been the catalyst to digging deeper into the voltage system of the body. The data presents based on the scientific method of converting voltage to pH using one of two methods, the primary one being the intercept/slope formula and the other Nernst formula. It is actually not the blood being tested, it is the body voltage that gives a returned value based on 500000 line values of voltages, those are then converted to mV and using a conversion matrix by Dr Jerry Tennant, we can assume a pH from that. Because there are different voltage variations in the body one key factor is electrolytes, we have a few areas to look at but the main area concerning voltage is surrounding cell voltage around the membrane, inside it, and outside of it in relation to coagulation as my research has confirmed a disregulation of zeta potential in the colloidal suspension of cells, based on the behaviour of the blood.
Cell voltage and body voltage are measurable and not only can we infer the pH from the results, this can be quantified using live blood analysis to see the zeta potential disruption thus we can also look at the amount of tech to then cross reference with the voltage readings.
Because we now know that there is a silica component in the tech, we also know that silica is notoriously unstable in an alkaline environment and we also know the connections between the acidity occuring in people being correlated to the glutathione production process being inhibited or damaged due to the nanotech getting inside the white blood cells (neutrophils) where the myeloperoxidase enzyme is generated as part of the glutathione production mechanism, glutathione being the largest antioxidant in the body and incidentally which research validates as being able to biodegrade graphene so we can see the cascade effect here but in low concentration has potential to help create an acidic environment.
Voltage appears to be the most unused tool to determine the state of the body when we are inherently energised with electrons and reactive to photons making strategies including photon biomodulation a good option.
Carbon is made up 6 protons, 6 electrons, and 6 neutrons, we cannot discount the data we get when passively reading voltage or electrons, that give us information about pH levels and if we see levels outside of the norm yet people report feeling better this could mean the test or methodology is problematic or the reference data is wrong or incomplete or both. Either way the voltage testing is a way to get new data points top work with.
I wouldn't offer unsolicited links but there is some info related to atoms and lasers which interconnects with the notion that laser work for good as they also work for evil so we must work with a certain acumen to enable us to question but to validate the anecdotal evidence presented by people who tend to read themselves better than any computer program can, at least while we have the ability to have intuition.
The link contains info that is not intended to convince the reader about anything, rather it opens the floor to questions about how new ways of looking at a problem can result in new testing methods that provide more insight into an existing 'modulation' problem we are facing today. I'm hoping we have mature readers who can look at this objectively to help put focus on how modulation and resonance impacts our bodies externally and internally when it comes to contexts such as voltage regulation and pH. Imagine looking at nutrients as voltages in mV rather than vitamins and minerals and if we look at it this way, why could we not look at pH levels as voltages that can be added or subtracted through bio modulation that resonates with our cells to increase or decrease our pH. Isn't life all a number game..as Nicola Tesla wrote: "if you understand the magnificence of 3, 6, and 9, then you would have the key to the universe".
Alkalosis is reported to occur from 11 pH to 14 pH. pH tests are in fact based on voltage conversions using intercept/slope calculation which is approximate as compared to Nernst formula, A more accurate test would be to add temperature compensation and we would see a far higher precision in pH levels. However, voltage tests can vary as they are based on a differential between environmental electromagnetic fields and ground and this is variable between environments raising questions about how body electromagnetic field disruptions could correlate to better or worse health (including pH) especially when we're dealing with positive/negative ions and electrons in relation to environmental electromagnetic influences. In most cases, the pH levels are within range and although some people have shown an increase upwards of 9-10 pH their pre-laser voltage test indicated below 7 pH.
At 11 to 14 blood pH you are dead. Not sickened, but dead from acute alkalosis.
Anything above 8 (being generous with this number) is dangerous alkalinity in that it begins to damage many processes and organs over time. The higher the level of alkalinity goes, the greater the damage. Hence why the body has so many ways to balance and maintain a pH of 7 to 7.45. It's that potentially damaging.
If you are saying electrical voltage tests of pH outweigh simple litmus tests for accuracy, okay, but I don't know anyone other than you who says this. Granted perhaps I'm just ignorant as is everyone else I know.
What I'm not talking about is how to measure pH using voltage, but the effects of raising pH using green lasers to levels commonly known and observed to be harmful.
Fair enough, we need to do a side by side comparison of blood and urine ph compared to the electrical voltage ph equation as people are certainly not feeling unwell after treatment, quite the opposite.
People are also feeling well after years post jab. This doesn't necessarily mean all is well. Though I am not poo-pooing that people are feeling good post laser treatment. I think that's great.
What I am saying, and no one like the saying of this, is all things have a downside. It's best to go into something aware of the potentiality than is is to be blind to the downside and possibly cause oneself more harm than good.
It's like antibiotics. Fantastic in their killing power over bacteria, but unwillingness to soberly understand the downside of antibiotics has led to overprescription and a myriad of problems decades later that are irreversible. And this is a pretty benign illustration.
I'm not talking about the methods of measurement of pH, litmus test vs. voltage test. That is fairly unimportant. I'm talking about the raising of the alkalinity pH of the blood by applying the laser treatments and how much it's raised, etc. Whether once the pH is raised how long does it stay raised? Does it return to the desired healthy levels or once raised does it stay at the raised pH? How much time should be established between laser treatments so the blood readjusts to it healthy pH levels?
It is an established fact blood must be maintained between 7 to 7.45 for health. To induce alkalinity in the blood higher than this causes disease. This is a fact.
So, I think it's wise for people to understand what they're doing rather than to misunderstand and incur damage that may be avoided with adjustments to treatment and monitoring of blood pH.
Blood pH is indeed extremely sensitive to fluctuations in pH and less forgiving. Additionally, we would very likely get differing results with urine and saliva in which I have coded for both in my software and this would expand the results for these compensations which could very well assist with further analysis methodologies.
We are aware that there are multiple pH levels across the body and a voltage test on one variable such as external body voltage doesn't give the complete picture as I am aware of the multiple domains of pH levels through the body from blood, through to the gut requiring varying levels to achieve their goals.
Voltage testing is a marker of pH levels in the body with one context specifically related to cell functioning and performance in relation to Zeta Potential, one topic not given the credit it fully deserves in mainstream medical sciences it seems.. who goes into a doctors office and gets an electrical body voltage test when there is science to prove its high efficacy? - look up the work of Dr Jerry Tennant (25th top doctor in the USA who founded the concept), Thomas Riddick(read this: Control of colloid stability through zeta potential), and expanding to efforts of Gerald Pollack (https://www.pollacklab.org/publications).
Remember, the laser is designed for an already quantified purpose and if it made people sicker we would have already seen the fallout yet, through observational analysis, the results speak for themselves.
The voltage testing is passive, meaning, it presents only the raw data but because it is based on a scientific methodology we have to ask the question 'are we now seeing a new baseline as compared to say 20 years ago if we were to employ the same technique?'. Either way, the laser is empirically sound, the voltage testing is a work in progress and gives us new data points for further research.
However, we are dealing with a new set of variables in terms of a multifaceted problem with extra mechanisms in the blood that should not be there and so any proven metric to gain data points such as body voltage testing enables us to get a better picture about any disparities or discontinuities while providing new data points to chase.
What is unusual is that the work of Dr Jerry Tennant states that our body voltage should operate within a range of -400 - 400mV yet we are seeing min and max values upwards of 5000mV and I even found a result with 6000mV on one occasion.
I have encountered some information about the spike in electrical charge being relevant to lets call them plasmon particulates in the blood causing some interference with the body electronics in terms of positive and negative charges surrounding blood cells. When the research presents these particulates having an "overunity" meaning being able to spend more energy than is absorbed, by a magnitude in order of 10-12 times, then we can hypothesize that the spikes could very well correlated to the voltage min and max values as not everyone has the same results but many show spikes in the positive and negative values.
I'm always recalibrating my methods in conjunction with feedback from experts and research, interestingly enough mainstream research don't appear to be holding all their cards close to their chest as there is some very damning research pointing to the problems today, it's just written in riddles making it very difficult to translate.
Love the dialogue, this is what gives new frames of reference to discovering new avenues to travel and to be closed minded is to shut the gate to a new world of possibilities.
To add a philosophical comment, if this stuff is in the blood with potential to have been there for at least 3-4 years then wouldn't it be dutiful to discover any changes in medical goal posts in relation to medical protocols that could subvert the validity of mainstream testing adding a blatant inclusion of confirmation bias into the mix? What i'm saying is that if we are testing for 'things' now getting results that differ from mainstream methodologies then how could the differences be explained by mainstream medical sciences when those sciences can't be trusted to present data in an unbiased way due to conflicts of interest or funding for specific research that is not conducive to total population wellness, it confounds the whole process of obtaining un-contaminated data.
The reason I say this is because much of the research is based on mainstream science that we are conditioned to trust yet that same system is funded by an anti-trust institution so if a laser presents a positive effect based on a person feeling that effect does that negate the science or are we still conditioned to solely absorb the science and ignore the person saying they feel better? If they feel better and the science tells us they should not be then who and what do we question, the individual or the system that designed the expected outcome?
Science is great but so is the person saying that's how they feel after undergoing a treatment not widely publicised as a mitigation to wellness.
I responded to Matt above and I agree with you, though, as I wrote, people who were jabbed years ago are feeling well but that doesn't mean all is well. As we are becoming aware of day by day.
I also agree new methods need be approached with open minds, but human minds also have a proclivity to attach quickly to a "solution" without considering the long term or subtle consequences which do come back to bite the bootay later.
Every cure or solution to a problem has a downside. That is all I'm saying and if a potential downside is observed, I think it's also best to look at it headon and evaluate and possibly mitigate the pitfalls.
We all know riding in a car is safer when wearing a seatbelt, though many, myself included, don't like the constraint of the belt. It is good the belt is there and available to me. I can then evaluate my options and choose to wear it or not, but I am fully informed and understand what I'm choosing.
I know you're right about old paradigms of science and medicine being proven false by the day and we need to understand that and move ahead. If pH litmus tests are proven inadequate and a better method of pH measurement can be used, we need to use the better.
Thanks for the discussion. It is important we all discuss what we think regardless of knowledge base and not let the quest for the elimination of the nanotech be a popularity contest but a sober hunt.
I am only advocating caution as we venture into new frontiers. Like Capt. Kirk.
Are you seeing ANY difference between jabbed and unjabbed blood? If there is no difference then I wonder what the purpose of the jabs were because the NT/MT must be coming from some other source/s.
This would be the simplest and fastest method to get rid of killer tech .
Chelation works many wonders, great improvements even apart wrecking the tech, but is not for everyone. It needs a disciplined life, with intermittent fasting, if done properly, difficult to observe for many.
Would the green light in a room, or sauna, everywhere, many bulbs of just green, will have the same effect like the laser, with much longer exposure of course-we can spend our day in this ambience, maybe?
And adding some frequencies, mass homeopathic protocols-Banerji style? That’s for we need talented homeopathic docs to come together, maybe Banerji’s clinic too, we don’t have time for personalized homeopathy for all beings on the planet.
Joette Calabrese is a great homeopath, specializing in Banerji aproach.
Again about green bulbs, if workable, autistic children, other anxious people won’t panic during treatment sessions, it might be funny for them to be in a green chamber, maybe, instead having something pointed in their mouth or belly for tens of minutes?
The green doesn't get rid of all the tech, its mainly the polymer clots. I think small amounts may be more effective than large amounts but this needs to be quantified via trial and error. Regards, Matt.
What if we’d use the green Weber laser method, exposed by yourself and doing the belly button position, suggested by Medicman, each day , maybe more than once a day and then finding a seasoned homeopathic doc or more🙏 to work around how to efficiently eliminate the polymer gunk resulted after laser sessions? The only way with homeopathy might be Banerji like approach , my hobbyist -only guess here, we may not have time to go the Hahnemann route, for all the planet…
I don’t have a link, his stack is called 420MedicineMan and he and Matt were speaking about this approach in the comments of one of Matt’s recent stacks…
Hope this helps. This may be a great and simple way to wreck the tech in everyone…
Thanks for all the work you are doing and sharing with us tentative solutions. The fractal antennae from the lung sample is very large, well developed. We probably all have something like that in us. Again, thankful for you, Matt!
Hi Bonnie I'm not Matt but can speak to Borax in the water. Good for you as it will stop the progression of arthritis and osteoporosis. See Dr George Flechas MD, PHD on YouTube. Watch his videos on his 30 or so years of research on this topic.
Weber has a long history of medical trials and experience but I have not tested those so cannot say. We did test a red watch (not a Weber) and the blood looked worse. This could have been temporary with longer term benefits but we don't know.
Recently I became seriously ill with Sepsis, Flu and Pneumonia. I still have no idea how. It happened over three hours. I’m Unvaxxed but I live with a person who is triple vaxxed. While in hospital I was, I believe, further poisoned with a venom based drug after they enrolled me into a research program without my consent. I have no idea what they poisoned me with but I almost died when my diaphragm froze. I saved my life with Ivermectin. Does anyone know the name of a private lab which would analyse my blood to establish what they injected me with ?
Just another thing about the little guy laser. You can't type if you have to hold it on the belly. I'm trying the groin area, the skin is thin depending on the location,thinner than the belly, so that is good for effect (?). The groin is kept occupied but typing is no problem...as the undies keeps it in place😍
True, feeling well doesn't always mean being well. However, in the context of wellness there is a psychosomatic angle to a certain degree. Our pH test is actually based on science and research and we do use it as a way to quantify laser results as the data is showing there are pretty accurate each time also having blood samples to compare with. The biggest benefit is that we get data points to analyse as without any testing we would just be chasing our tail to a point and people don't always feel an improvement yet the numbers are generally quite affirming. The holes and pitfalls are indeed a trap as if we ignore these, good solutions can be missed.
Photon bio modulation has some amazing areas of healing especially when this part of science has been used to design what we are fighting today. Call it fighting fire with fire or photons with photons. Appreciate the dialogue, we must all pursue this problem with open minds given the nature of the problem and so we don't lock ourselves out of any potential resolutions.
Blood is indeed extremely sensitive to fluctuations in pH and less forgiving. Additionally, we would very likely get differing results with urine and saliva in which I have coded for both in my software and this would expand the results for these compensations which could very well assist with further analysis methodologies.
We are aware that there are multiple pH levels across the body and a voltage test on one variable such as external body voltage doesn't give the complete picture as I am aware of the multiple domains of pH levels through the body from blood, through to the gut requiring varying levels to achieve their goals.
Voltage testing is a marker of pH levels in the body with one context specifically related to cell functioning and performance in relation to Zeta Potential, one topic not given the credit it fully deserves in mainstream medical sciences it seems.. who goes into a doctors office and gets an electrical body voltage test when there is science to prove its high efficacy? - look up the work of Dr Jerry Tennant (25th top doctor in the USA who founded the concept), Thomas Riddick(read this: Control of colloid stability through zeta potential), and expanding to efforts of Gerald Pollack (https://www.pollacklab.org/publications).
Remember, the laser is designed for an already quantified purpose and if it made people sicker we would have already seen the fallout yet, through observational analysis, the results speak for themselves.
The voltage testing is passive, meaning, it presents only the raw data but because it is based on a scientific methodology we have to ask the question 'are we now seeing a new baseline as compared to say 20 years ago if we were to employ the same technique?'. Either way, the laser is empirically sound, the voltage testing is a work in progress and gives us new data points for further research.
However, we are dealing with a new set of variables in terms of a multifaceted problem with extra mechanisms in the blood that should not be there and so any proven metric to gain data points such as body voltage testing enables us to get a better picture about any disparities or discontinuities while providing new data points to chase.
What is unusual is that the work of Dr Jerry Tennant states that our body voltage should operate within a range of -400 - 400mV yet we are seeing min and max values upwards of 5000mV and I even found a result with 6000mV on one occasion.
I have encountered some information about the spike in electrical charge being relevant to lets call them plasmon particulates in the blood causing some interference with the body electronics in terms of positive and negative charges surrounding blood cells. When the research presents these particulates having an "overunity" meaning being able to spend more energy than is absorbed, by a magnitude in order of 10-12 times, then we can hypothesize that the spikes could very well correlated to the voltage min and max values as not everyone has the same results but many show spikes in the positive and negative values.
I'm always recalibrating my methods in conjunction with feedback from experts and research, interestingly enough mainstream research don't appear to be holding all their cards close to their chest as there is some very damning research pointing to the problems today, it's just written in riddles making it very difficult to translate.
Love the dialogue, this is what gives new frames of reference to discovering new avenues to travel and to be closed minded is to shut the gate to a new world of possibilities.
When you say Ph levels were raised by 2 points from 5 to 7 and 7 to 9 are these blood Ph?
Does it concern you that a Ph of 9 is considered an indication of alkalosis which can be very harmful to the body especially the kidneys? And someone who has a Ph of 5 is in acidosis and likely quite ill?
The body's blood Ph is normally 7 to 7.45 and strictly maintained by checks and balances within the body system for good reason.
Wondering, not criticising...Thank you for the report.
What is in the blood today is messing with 'the body systems' and this has been the catalyst to digging deeper into the voltage system of the body. The data presents based on the scientific method of converting voltage to pH using one of two methods, the primary one being the intercept/slope formula and the other Nernst formula. It is actually not the blood being tested, it is the body voltage that gives a returned value based on 500000 line values of voltages, those are then converted to mV and using a conversion matrix by Dr Jerry Tennant, we can assume a pH from that. Because there are different voltage variations in the body one key factor is electrolytes, we have a few areas to look at but the main area concerning voltage is surrounding cell voltage around the membrane, inside it, and outside of it in relation to coagulation as my research has confirmed a disregulation of zeta potential in the colloidal suspension of cells, based on the behaviour of the blood.
Cell voltage and body voltage are measurable and not only can we infer the pH from the results, this can be quantified using live blood analysis to see the zeta potential disruption thus we can also look at the amount of tech to then cross reference with the voltage readings.
Because we now know that there is a silica component in the tech, we also know that silica is notoriously unstable in an alkaline environment and we also know the connections between the acidity occuring in people being correlated to the glutathione production process being inhibited or damaged due to the nanotech getting inside the white blood cells (neutrophils) where the myeloperoxidase enzyme is generated as part of the glutathione production mechanism, glutathione being the largest antioxidant in the body and incidentally which research validates as being able to biodegrade graphene so we can see the cascade effect here but in low concentration has potential to help create an acidic environment.
Voltage appears to be the most unused tool to determine the state of the body when we are inherently energised with electrons and reactive to photons making strategies including photon biomodulation a good option.
Carbon is made up 6 protons, 6 electrons, and 6 neutrons, we cannot discount the data we get when passively reading voltage or electrons, that give us information about pH levels and if we see levels outside of the norm yet people report feeling better this could mean the test or methodology is problematic or the reference data is wrong or incomplete or both. Either way the voltage testing is a way to get new data points top work with.
I wouldn't offer unsolicited links but there is some info related to atoms and lasers which interconnects with the notion that laser work for good as they also work for evil so we must work with a certain acumen to enable us to question but to validate the anecdotal evidence presented by people who tend to read themselves better than any computer program can, at least while we have the ability to have intuition.
The link contains info that is not intended to convince the reader about anything, rather it opens the floor to questions about how new ways of looking at a problem can result in new testing methods that provide more insight into an existing 'modulation' problem we are facing today. I'm hoping we have mature readers who can look at this objectively to help put focus on how modulation and resonance impacts our bodies externally and internally when it comes to contexts such as voltage regulation and pH. Imagine looking at nutrients as voltages in mV rather than vitamins and minerals and if we look at it this way, why could we not look at pH levels as voltages that can be added or subtracted through bio modulation that resonates with our cells to increase or decrease our pH. Isn't life all a number game..as Nicola Tesla wrote: "if you understand the magnificence of 3, 6, and 9, then you would have the key to the universe".
https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/the-power-of-graphene-6-protons-6-neutrons-6-electrons-the-mark-of-the-beast-666
Sorry, a bit long winded but I can get philosophical at times in the midst of an analytical problem.
Alkalosis is reported to occur from 11 pH to 14 pH. pH tests are in fact based on voltage conversions using intercept/slope calculation which is approximate as compared to Nernst formula, A more accurate test would be to add temperature compensation and we would see a far higher precision in pH levels. However, voltage tests can vary as they are based on a differential between environmental electromagnetic fields and ground and this is variable between environments raising questions about how body electromagnetic field disruptions could correlate to better or worse health (including pH) especially when we're dealing with positive/negative ions and electrons in relation to environmental electromagnetic influences. In most cases, the pH levels are within range and although some people have shown an increase upwards of 9-10 pH their pre-laser voltage test indicated below 7 pH.
Cheers - K. The tech guy.
At 11 to 14 blood pH you are dead. Not sickened, but dead from acute alkalosis.
Anything above 8 (being generous with this number) is dangerous alkalinity in that it begins to damage many processes and organs over time. The higher the level of alkalinity goes, the greater the damage. Hence why the body has so many ways to balance and maintain a pH of 7 to 7.45. It's that potentially damaging.
If you are saying electrical voltage tests of pH outweigh simple litmus tests for accuracy, okay, but I don't know anyone other than you who says this. Granted perhaps I'm just ignorant as is everyone else I know.
What I'm not talking about is how to measure pH using voltage, but the effects of raising pH using green lasers to levels commonly known and observed to be harmful.
I can't see your reply answers my question.
Fair enough, we need to do a side by side comparison of blood and urine ph compared to the electrical voltage ph equation as people are certainly not feeling unwell after treatment, quite the opposite.
People are also feeling well after years post jab. This doesn't necessarily mean all is well. Though I am not poo-pooing that people are feeling good post laser treatment. I think that's great.
What I am saying, and no one like the saying of this, is all things have a downside. It's best to go into something aware of the potentiality than is is to be blind to the downside and possibly cause oneself more harm than good.
It's like antibiotics. Fantastic in their killing power over bacteria, but unwillingness to soberly understand the downside of antibiotics has led to overprescription and a myriad of problems decades later that are irreversible. And this is a pretty benign illustration.
I'm not talking about the methods of measurement of pH, litmus test vs. voltage test. That is fairly unimportant. I'm talking about the raising of the alkalinity pH of the blood by applying the laser treatments and how much it's raised, etc. Whether once the pH is raised how long does it stay raised? Does it return to the desired healthy levels or once raised does it stay at the raised pH? How much time should be established between laser treatments so the blood readjusts to it healthy pH levels?
It is an established fact blood must be maintained between 7 to 7.45 for health. To induce alkalinity in the blood higher than this causes disease. This is a fact.
So, I think it's wise for people to understand what they're doing rather than to misunderstand and incur damage that may be avoided with adjustments to treatment and monitoring of blood pH.
Thanks K for answering that one.
His answer didn't answer my questions. Though I appreciate the information on measuring pH levels using voltage rather than simple litmus tests.
IMO I think my questions need consideration.
Blood pH is indeed extremely sensitive to fluctuations in pH and less forgiving. Additionally, we would very likely get differing results with urine and saliva in which I have coded for both in my software and this would expand the results for these compensations which could very well assist with further analysis methodologies.
We are aware that there are multiple pH levels across the body and a voltage test on one variable such as external body voltage doesn't give the complete picture as I am aware of the multiple domains of pH levels through the body from blood, through to the gut requiring varying levels to achieve their goals.
Voltage testing is a marker of pH levels in the body with one context specifically related to cell functioning and performance in relation to Zeta Potential, one topic not given the credit it fully deserves in mainstream medical sciences it seems.. who goes into a doctors office and gets an electrical body voltage test when there is science to prove its high efficacy? - look up the work of Dr Jerry Tennant (25th top doctor in the USA who founded the concept), Thomas Riddick(read this: Control of colloid stability through zeta potential), and expanding to efforts of Gerald Pollack (https://www.pollacklab.org/publications).
Remember, the laser is designed for an already quantified purpose and if it made people sicker we would have already seen the fallout yet, through observational analysis, the results speak for themselves.
The voltage testing is passive, meaning, it presents only the raw data but because it is based on a scientific methodology we have to ask the question 'are we now seeing a new baseline as compared to say 20 years ago if we were to employ the same technique?'. Either way, the laser is empirically sound, the voltage testing is a work in progress and gives us new data points for further research.
However, we are dealing with a new set of variables in terms of a multifaceted problem with extra mechanisms in the blood that should not be there and so any proven metric to gain data points such as body voltage testing enables us to get a better picture about any disparities or discontinuities while providing new data points to chase.
What is unusual is that the work of Dr Jerry Tennant states that our body voltage should operate within a range of -400 - 400mV yet we are seeing min and max values upwards of 5000mV and I even found a result with 6000mV on one occasion.
I have encountered some information about the spike in electrical charge being relevant to lets call them plasmon particulates in the blood causing some interference with the body electronics in terms of positive and negative charges surrounding blood cells. When the research presents these particulates having an "overunity" meaning being able to spend more energy than is absorbed, by a magnitude in order of 10-12 times, then we can hypothesize that the spikes could very well correlated to the voltage min and max values as not everyone has the same results but many show spikes in the positive and negative values.
I'm always recalibrating my methods in conjunction with feedback from experts and research, interestingly enough mainstream research don't appear to be holding all their cards close to their chest as there is some very damning research pointing to the problems today, it's just written in riddles making it very difficult to translate.
Love the dialogue, this is what gives new frames of reference to discovering new avenues to travel and to be closed minded is to shut the gate to a new world of possibilities.
To add a philosophical comment, if this stuff is in the blood with potential to have been there for at least 3-4 years then wouldn't it be dutiful to discover any changes in medical goal posts in relation to medical protocols that could subvert the validity of mainstream testing adding a blatant inclusion of confirmation bias into the mix? What i'm saying is that if we are testing for 'things' now getting results that differ from mainstream methodologies then how could the differences be explained by mainstream medical sciences when those sciences can't be trusted to present data in an unbiased way due to conflicts of interest or funding for specific research that is not conducive to total population wellness, it confounds the whole process of obtaining un-contaminated data.
The reason I say this is because much of the research is based on mainstream science that we are conditioned to trust yet that same system is funded by an anti-trust institution so if a laser presents a positive effect based on a person feeling that effect does that negate the science or are we still conditioned to solely absorb the science and ignore the person saying they feel better? If they feel better and the science tells us they should not be then who and what do we question, the individual or the system that designed the expected outcome?
Science is great but so is the person saying that's how they feel after undergoing a treatment not widely publicised as a mitigation to wellness.
I responded to Matt above and I agree with you, though, as I wrote, people who were jabbed years ago are feeling well but that doesn't mean all is well. As we are becoming aware of day by day.
I also agree new methods need be approached with open minds, but human minds also have a proclivity to attach quickly to a "solution" without considering the long term or subtle consequences which do come back to bite the bootay later.
Every cure or solution to a problem has a downside. That is all I'm saying and if a potential downside is observed, I think it's also best to look at it headon and evaluate and possibly mitigate the pitfalls.
We all know riding in a car is safer when wearing a seatbelt, though many, myself included, don't like the constraint of the belt. It is good the belt is there and available to me. I can then evaluate my options and choose to wear it or not, but I am fully informed and understand what I'm choosing.
I know you're right about old paradigms of science and medicine being proven false by the day and we need to understand that and move ahead. If pH litmus tests are proven inadequate and a better method of pH measurement can be used, we need to use the better.
Thanks for the discussion. It is important we all discuss what we think regardless of knowledge base and not let the quest for the elimination of the nanotech be a popularity contest but a sober hunt.
I am only advocating caution as we venture into new frontiers. Like Capt. Kirk.
Amazing work Matt!!!!
Are you seeing ANY difference between jabbed and unjabbed blood? If there is no difference then I wonder what the purpose of the jabs were because the NT/MT must be coming from some other source/s.
No, today I cannot see any obvious difference. If people are aware and doing something their blood looks better, if not there is a mounting decline.
Hi Matt, do you know where these people got the laser treatments, in a clinic, or they bought the machines?
Hi Proton, In a clinic. The home made one is in a link in these comments.
Thanks Matt, not sure which link, is it this?
https://ja.aliexpress.com/item/1005004774843293.html?spm=a2g0o.order_list.order_list_main.138.f3631802shd0n8&gatewayAdapt=glo2jpn
yes, not fully effective but better than nothing. I am testing some to see what the minimum is to be fully effective.
Thanks in advance for keeping us posted.
Great you are doing some practical work on this!
So I guess you will try to get a dose-response curve?
Is this to be used sublingual? Sorry to ask so many questions,
I am currently trying my belly button as suggested here below.
Hi Matt, sorry there's no link below...thanks!
Such horrifying but necessary information. Thank you Matt
Green lasers are definitely the greatest option.
This would be the simplest and fastest method to get rid of killer tech .
Chelation works many wonders, great improvements even apart wrecking the tech, but is not for everyone. It needs a disciplined life, with intermittent fasting, if done properly, difficult to observe for many.
Would the green light in a room, or sauna, everywhere, many bulbs of just green, will have the same effect like the laser, with much longer exposure of course-we can spend our day in this ambience, maybe?
And adding some frequencies, mass homeopathic protocols-Banerji style? That’s for we need talented homeopathic docs to come together, maybe Banerji’s clinic too, we don’t have time for personalized homeopathy for all beings on the planet.
Joette Calabrese is a great homeopath, specializing in Banerji aproach.
Again about green bulbs, if workable, autistic children, other anxious people won’t panic during treatment sessions, it might be funny for them to be in a green chamber, maybe, instead having something pointed in their mouth or belly for tens of minutes?
Thank you for your invaluable work!
Hi Monica,
The green doesn't get rid of all the tech, its mainly the polymer clots. I think small amounts may be more effective than large amounts but this needs to be quantified via trial and error. Regards, Matt.
What if we’d use the green Weber laser method, exposed by yourself and doing the belly button position, suggested by Medicman, each day , maybe more than once a day and then finding a seasoned homeopathic doc or more🙏 to work around how to efficiently eliminate the polymer gunk resulted after laser sessions? The only way with homeopathy might be Banerji like approach , my hobbyist -only guess here, we may not have time to go the Hahnemann route, for all the planet…
Thank you for all this invaluable work!
Hello Monica, do you have a link to medicman's belly suggestion? Thanks
Hi, Proton!
I don’t have a link, his stack is called 420MedicineMan and he and Matt were speaking about this approach in the comments of one of Matt’s recent stacks…
Hope this helps. This may be a great and simple way to wreck the tech in everyone…
Be well,
Thanks so much Monica! I bought the line/dot laser and its in the mail now.
Also you might have some ideas for us on EDTA here
https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/edta-trick-or-treat
Keep in touch, PM
Thank you!
Thankyou for sharing. I miss looking down the mic...
Thanks for all the work you are doing and sharing with us tentative solutions. The fractal antennae from the lung sample is very large, well developed. We probably all have something like that in us. Again, thankful for you, Matt!
Hi Matt- Have you ever tested to see if Borax works?
I put it in my water But am not spending money on live blood analysis. Lost my lab job to the jab!
Hi Bonnie I'm not Matt but can speak to Borax in the water. Good for you as it will stop the progression of arthritis and osteoporosis. See Dr George Flechas MD, PHD on YouTube. Watch his videos on his 30 or so years of research on this topic.
Thanks!
https://www.earthclinic.com/remedies/borax.html
Not yet.
Matt, many thanks for your diligent efforts on behalf of humanity. We appreciate any information that can be used to keep us healthy and alive.
I too appreciate the feedback and info people send me here. It all helps, Thanks.
This is good news Matt! What do you think of this kind of Weber, the watch?
https://weberlasersystems.com/products/spectra-laser-watch
Hi Proton,
Weber has a long history of medical trials and experience but I have not tested those so cannot say. We did test a red watch (not a Weber) and the blood looked worse. This could have been temporary with longer term benefits but we don't know.
At least these kinds of investigations are possibly leading to something. Great kind of post Matt!
Very interesting upload Matt.
I'll have to look at a lung oyster under my chinoscope this evening just for the heck of it.
Let us know , Cheers.